west
2006-12-06 22:11:09 UTC
Sorry for the question but I have to ask since I cannot answer.
Wife factor. If we get a telescope, any type or size, and then we
look at Saturn, or the Moon or nebula, why have a telescope after
that? The objects will still be there. So, why invest in a
telescope?
I can't answer this question. I'm thinking a fixed 16" Meade with
some sort of environmental protection. But indeed, seeing Saturn once
and then going away is a fine solution via alternate observatory
resources. I dunno.
Stumped.
Gary Gaugler, Ph.D.
Microtechnics, Inc.
Granite Bay, CA 95746
916.791.8191
I sort of know what you mean. If you're not into photography, after a fewWife factor. If we get a telescope, any type or size, and then we
look at Saturn, or the Moon or nebula, why have a telescope after
that? The objects will still be there. So, why invest in a
telescope?
I can't answer this question. I'm thinking a fixed 16" Meade with
some sort of environmental protection. But indeed, seeing Saturn once
and then going away is a fine solution via alternate observatory
resources. I dunno.
Stumped.
Gary Gaugler, Ph.D.
Microtechnics, Inc.
Granite Bay, CA 95746
916.791.8191
sessions, what do you do? It's like the Peggy Lee song .. "Is that All There
Is?" What can you truly enjoy as a new adventures in Deep Sky, live time
observations? I think the Hubble ruined it for me. You look at its pixs and
then look at yours and there goes that song again. "Bang" ... <sound of a
bullet against my temple>.
Cordially,
west